The Need for Speed: How Readers Get News is Affecting the Way Sports Journalism is Reported and Written

Over the last ten years, the way fans get news about their favorite sports’ team has changed considerably. Gone are the days when people had to wait for the morning newspaper so they could read a sports article about what happened to their team. Today, people are getting news from different mediums.

What has replaced the old model of gathering news for printed newspapers is the increased role of social media such as Facebook, Twitter and blogging. People want news as fast as possible. They want to know what’s going on all the time, so reporters and writers have to do everything they can to make that happen, or they’ll lose readers and interest.

In addition, digital media is a tool that’s becoming very commonplace with reporters too. They’re using phones or a personal camera to make video and pictures of their subjects.

The catch to this new form of journalism is that putting together a project with video, audio, pictures and a written story can be done fairly fast depending on the size, and it’s usually done by one person. Unlike writing for a printed publication, a reporter personally edits what he or she has, and uploads it almost immediately onto an online blog or social media platform.

This is the direction that sports journalism is going in. The use of social media, blogs and digital media has affected and changed the way sports journalism is written and reported on. It’s all about getting news out quickly and efficiently before anyone else does.

“[Blogs] also allows for immediacy,” said Paul Flannery, an NBA writer for the sports blog SB Nation and former Boston Celtics writer for sports radio WEEI in Boston. “When I used to cover Celtics’ practices, I would turn around the basic nuts and bolts of the day in a couple of hours, and that wouldn’t be the kind of thing that would show up in your newspaper until 16 hours later, but it would already be up on our site.”

What Flannery means by “nuts and bolts” is that he could post news quickly about what players were hurt, who was going to play in that night’s game, who was mad, and what quotes were being said in the matter of hours. That’s something, which is completely different and couldn’t be done by someone writing for a printed newspaper.

Chris Forsberg, a Celtics writer for ESPN Boston, is one of the top, young and up-and-coming sportswriters in Boston. He writes game analysis, and game reactions for his blog on ESPN Boston. He said social media has changed a lot in the way sports news is reported on.

“[With social media] it helps facilitate how quickly we can distribute the news because of the 24-hour news cycle,” Forsberg said. “Essentially you got news you don’t want to wait to put in the newspaper anymore. There’s no more waking up to the news. You got to get it out there quickly whether it’s through Twitter, blogging or Facebook so that people can react to it.”

In fact, Forsberg said one of the best social media platforms in general for covering the Celtics is Twitter.

“Everything goes through Twitter now regardless of whether it’s a reporter breaking a story or it’s a player saying something,” Forsberg said. “Reporters would’ve called us crazy if you told us 20 years ago that a lot of stories, or a lot of what the athlete is thinking, would come through this 140 character site. It’s always intriguing to watch.”

In addition, he said that the one thing that social media and Twitter has done is foster a great sense of community with readers.

“You now have to have an audience,” Forsberg said. “You put the news up and you not only tell people about it, but now you’re getting them to react to [it] and to get outsider opinion, which sort of [starts] the conversation.”

It’s also interesting to note that Forsberg said players might not always be straight with reporters on camera. Instead, they might post interesting tweets by voicing their opinion about an incident, or something that happened during a game. Tweets like that could lead to another story too.

Jimmy Toscano, a Celtics and New England Patriots’ writer for Comcast Sports Net New England (CSNNE) and a blogger for, went along the same lines as Forsberg, and said Twitter is very important for a reporter.

“If you don’t have a Twitter account, I suggest you get one,” Toscano said. “That’s the first place to get news today. I have a Twitter account and I follow [a] wide range of people that I get news so quickly compared to when it’s up on a website. [Twitter] really is the first place to get news depending on who you follow and what type of news you’re looking for.”

Toscano continued by saying if a story isn’t ready to be published, but there’s important information to get out there then tweeting is important. He said having your name attached to breaking news is important, and it gives you a leg up on the competition.

Since news has to be constantly updated and put on the web regularly, many reporters are approaching interviews differently too.

Toscano said nowadays digital media has made it so that interviews are on tape or video only.

“No longer is it just showing up [to interview someone] with a pen and pad and taking a couple of notes of what a player says,” Toscano explained. “It’s common to see bloggers, and online reporters in the locker rooms after games holding up a video camera, and recorder to a player who’s talking.”

Toscano might be referring to Forsberg as the one who uses only a camera and microphone.

“A lot of veteran reporters make fun of me because I don’t have a notepad or pen when going into the locker room,” Forsberg said. “Nowadays I carry three things. I carry my cell phone, a video recorder, and an audio recorder. Essentially that’s all I need when I’m in there, because those tools allow me to tell stories differently.

Forsberg said that using his digital equipment over using a pen and notebook allows him to tell stories not through just words, but by giving people pictures, sights and sounds of what’s going on in that environment.

Despite how quick stories get put onto the web and how sports journalism is changing; editing and the quality of writing are still very important.

“There’s great responsibility when posting online,” Flannery said. “Your writing has to be clear and without mistakes and sloppiness. I think the best part of sports journalism on the internet is taking the old school values that you learned and applying them into a much quicker medium.”

For more of an inside look at sports journalism, take a look at this video below. Some of the top Celtics’ writers and a student speak about the ever-changing world of sports journalism.


Storify: The Future of Social Media and Journalism

Social media has taken off like a rocket over the last six years or so. It all started with MySpace, then Facebook came around and made the process of being friends with someone ridiculously easy. After that, photo and networking sites such as Twitter, Tumblr, and Flickr started popping up. All these networks made connecting with the world unbelievably easy. Now the future of social media is upon us and it’s a fun website called Storify.

Mostly everyone, at least in the western world, loves social media.

They love the ease of connection, the feedback and the interesting debates about the news that’s currently taking place. Now imagine taking all the interesting parts and making them into a blog post, a story or even an article for a news network. That’s exactly what Storify does.

After listening to Josh Stearns, of the Free Press, talk about Storify and his 2011 Storify of the Year, I was thoroughly impressed at the potential Storify has in creating a new type of journalism.

Listening to him speak and through my own judgements, this type of “new media” can allow a user to take all sorts of tidbits of information from across the internet, such as tweets, quotes from news articles, videos from YouTube, pictures, and feedback from the public etc. to go and make a very interesting and interactive news article, similar to what Stearns did with his Storify of the Year project.

In his Storify, he was able to narrow down the journalist arrests at the Occupy movements all across the U.S., and make it into an interesting story by capturing quotes and tweets from the journalists on the ground who were getting arrested. He learned of these journalists by tracking them on Twitter, and then captured their direct tweets.

By doing this, he was able to show his viewers a visual of what was actually going on was for real and that the tweets backed up his claims as legitimate sources. This helped make his Storify more concrete and relevant as a news story.

As I mentioned earlier, I believe Storify is the future of social media and journalism.

Old-school journalism where a reporter goes to an event, covers it, and writes a 900-word story on it at his desk, or gets information from the AP wire, will one day become a thing of the past. Social media has connected the world and everyone has tapped into it to connect with each other.

Even the media networks and reporters are connected. Using those sites have enabled them to share information with the world at a much quicker rate. Storify will allow a social media geek to put stories together as soon as news happens by the second. News happens quick, but it takes a network a little bit of time to get on the air to report something and it takes journalists at least an hour or so to write a good story or blog post. Storify will decrease time.

Imagine if Storify and social media was around during 9/11. A second-by-second log could be recorded. Videos of the chaos and the scene in NYC could be uploaded. Tweets from people inside the Twin Towers or at the scene could be pooled together. Since everyone is connected, someone could’ve made a Storify to track this devastating event to show everyone what was going on without having them search all over the internet for news.

Plus, Storify allows a story to grow.

In other words, a journalist can keep adding to it where it’ll eventually become a chronological journal of the event. Traditional articles can’t technically grow, as a writer would have to pen another article to keep things relevant.

Another thing Storify does is it allows anyone to be a journalist.

The pros are it allows people who understand social media well and who understand journalism ethics to quickly make an interesting story that can clarify things for readers and viewers. Journalists will find this tool to be extremely helpful with their job.

The cons are anyone can do it. Someone who uses a computer all day and doesn’t have many responsibilities can put together something as relevant as a journalist and take full credit for “reporting” it without having the credentials, or having done the tough work. All people have to do is take the relevant social media tidbits they find and put it together as a story and call it their own. Like Stearns said, Storify attributes sources so no one can really claim plagiarism or that they weren’t cited correctly.

In the future, I expect many, if not all, news groups to have Storify as an integral part of their corporation. Just the site allowing someone to bring all sorts of information together is such an amazing tool to have. It’s reasonably easy to use so the learning curve wouldn’t be too hard, especially for anyone who has knows how to use Facebook or a computer.

In an age where everyone is online, many news organizations might find it easier to utilize than using old-fashioned reporting techniques. Combination reporting could be a new way to report events. Having journalists out on the ground tweeting and taking videos then having them send them to a social media reporter to put together a Storify could be a new wave of revolutionizing reporting that takes covering news to a whole new level.